16 Voice Of The Customer Recommendations November 16, 2009
Posted by Bruce Temkin in Customer experience, Voice of the customer.add a comment
I recently published a report called Sixteen Voice Of The Customer Recommendations. To uncover this advice, I analyzed the 40 nominations submitted for Forrester’s Voice Of The Customer (VoC) Award from earlier this year. I examined responses to the question: “What lessons have you learned that would be most valuable to other firms?“
The analysis uncovered these 16 recommendations across 5 categories:
The report included more than 50 snippets of advice in these areas. Here are a few of my favorites:
“VoC collection, reporting, and action (and NPS, in our case) is a journey — culture shift, statistics, change management, etc. — it takes time, you learn as you go, the journey never ends. Take it in bite-size chunks, otherwise you’ll choke.” (Consumer electronics company)
“We have found the open-ended feedback from customer surveys to be even more vital to our actions than the analysis of the scores themselves. It is this feedback that gets to the core of the voice of customer and provides the ‘why’ to the ‘what’ (the score itself).” (Insurance company)
“You have to democratize the VoC feedback. When you put the VoC data in the hands of the organization, you enable them to make interpretations and to contextualize the voice of the customer into the business problems they’re trying to solve.” (Healthcare company)
The bottom line: It’s time to ramp up your VoC efforts!
Congrats to VoC Winners: Experian, Progressive, and Vanguard June 22, 2009
Posted by Bruce Temkin in Customer experience, Forrester's Customer Experience Forum, Voice of the customer.Tags: Bain and Company, Burke Research, CAHPS, Cardinal Health, Cigna, Clarabridge, Cognos, Convergys, ECHO, Experian, Gaylord, Healthways, Hyatt Place, iModerate, iRobot, JD Power, Logitech, Lotus Notes, M/A/R/C, Medallia, Microsoft, National Committee for Quality Assurance, NICE, Opinion Lab, Oracle, Progressive Insurance, Radiano, RightNow Technologies, Satmetrix, Somentics, Symantec, TeaLeaf, Vanguard, Vovici, Webtrends
1 comment so far
Well, it’s been a wild day; the Grand Hyatt was hopping today as we kicked off our Customer Experience Forum.
My opening keynote speech seemed to go over really well. I weaved the story of the customer experience journey together with the story of Dorothy’s journey in the Wizard Of Oz. I actually ended my speech with a rewritten version of the song “Somewhere Over The Rainbow.” I also showcased some data from my new report that went live today called “Customer Experience Boosts Revenue.” I’ll talk more about my speech and that research in future posts.
For now, I want to congratulate the three winners of Forrester’s 2009 Voice Of The Customer (VoC) Award: Experian, Progressive, and Vanguard. We received 40 strong nominations, so these winners did a really great job. They all were adept at the four key elements of a VoC program: Listening, Interpreting, Reacting, and Monitoring and were able to identify significant business results from those efforts. You can download their nomination forms from Forrester’s customer experience blog.
There were so many outstanding nominations, that we named 11 finalists:
- Cardinal Health
- CIGNA
- Experian
- Gaylord
- Hyatt Place
- iRobot
- Logitech
- Oracle
- Progressive Insurance
- Symantec
- Vanguard
Voice of the customer is a critical component for just about any customer experience effort. And the trends indicate that VoC will become even more important in the future. A lot of the advances in VoC are coming from innovative work from a number of vendors. That’s why one of the questions we asked was: ”What technology vendors or service providers are critical to your success?”
Here’s a shout out to the vendors that were mentioned by the 11 finalists:
Bain and Company, Burke Research, CAHPS, Clarabridge, Cognos, Convergys, ECHO, Healthways, iModerate, JD Power, Lotus Notes, M/A/R/C, Medallia, Microsoft, National Committee for Quality Assurance, NICE, Opinion Lab, Oracle, Radiano, RightNow Technologies, Satmetrix, Somentics, TeaLeaf, Vovici, and Webtrends.
The nominations were loaded with great insights, so I’ll be writing a lot more about what we found.
The bottom line: Congratulations to all of the winners, finalists, and the vendors that helped!
New “Voice Of The Customer” Award April 21, 2009
Posted by Bruce Temkin in Customer experience, Voice of the customer.Tags: Voice of the customer award
add a comment
In recent research, I described how voice of the customer programs are going through major changes. Given these dramatic shifts, we decided to create an award that recognizes organizations for doing innovative work in this critical area of customer experience.
That’s why we’ve created a brand new award called Forrester’s Voice Of The Customer (VoC) award. We’re collecting nominations through Friday, May 22nd and award winners will be announced at Forrester’s Customer Experience Forum in New York on June 22nd.
We’ll grade the submissions based on the following four criteria:
- Business value to the organization
- Positive impact on customer experience
- Innovative approach
- Potential for other organizations to repeat the practice.
For more information about the award, including how to apply, go to: tinyurl.com/vocaward.
The bottom line: Tell us about your VoC efforts; there’s nothing to lose.
Six Trends Reshape Voice Of The Customer Programs March 8, 2009
Posted by Bruce Temkin in Customer experience, Voice of the customer.12 comments
One of the most important components of customer experience is a strong voice of the customer (VoC) program. In the past, I’ve written about two core elements of VoC programs: 1) The five levels of customer feedback; and 2) The “LIRM” processes for getting value from the feedback.
My work in this space has uncovered some major shifts; which led me to publish a report called Voice Of The Customer: The Next Generation. To begin with, I’ve found a number of problems with current approaches to VoC programs, the most glaring is that programs are all listen and no action. Companies obsess about the measurements and analysis, but many lack processes for responding to the insights in a closed-loop manner.
Given the current issues with VoC programs and the new capabilities enabled by a host of vendors, I outlined 6 key trends for VoC Programs:
- Tapping into unstructured and unsolicited feedback
- Integrating social media monitoring
- Increasing the tempo of responding
- Widening the access to insights
- Going beyond metrics to diagnostics
- Creating continuous feedback mechanisms.
I can’t go over the entire report in my blog, but I wanted to highlight the first trend. Today, most firms use multiple-choice surveys as the basis for their VoC programs. But there’s a ton of other listening posts that don’t fit into this mold. So companies regularly lose out on critical insights. But new capabilites like text mining, sentiment inference, and social media extraction allow firms to systematically gain insights from unstructured, unsolicited feedback:

These important listening posts include items like inbound emails, calls into the call center, comments on surveys, comments on company blogs, posts and comments on non-company blogs, and feedback on third party sites.
The bottom line: The voice of the customer is too valuable to waste
LEGO’s Building Block For Good Experiences March 3, 2009
Posted by Bruce Temkin in Customer experience, Voice of the customer.Tags: LEGO
19 comments
I recently chatted with LEGO about their customer experience efforts; they’ve got a lot of interesting initiatives underway. One of the things that really caught my eye was a tool they call the “experience wheel.” They were gracious enough to let me share it (you can click on the image to see a larger version):
This is an example of the output after a couple of steps; showing an approach to design a WOW experience for a flight to NYC. Here are some of the reasons that I really like this tool:
- It’s great to have a formal approach to describing/designing experiences
- It starts with the description of a specific customer (in the center)
- It recognizes the life cycle of experiences: before, during, and after
- It’s easy to use and simple to understand
If you’ve got a tool that works for you, I’d love to see it!
The bottom line: Experience design can be a discipline!
Wells Fargo Improves Communications With Ethnography November 5, 2008
Posted by Bruce Temkin in Customer experience, Design solutions, EBD #1: Obsess About Customer Needs, Voice of the customer.Tags: Ethnography, Helene Alunni-Botteri, Robin Beers, Wells Fargo
3 comments
Robin Beers (VP of Customer Insights) and Helene Alunni-Botteri (Vice President, Strategic Planning) at Wells Fargo briefed me about a research project in which the bank used ethnographic techniques to examine its written communications. It was a pretty novel approach, so I published a research report about the effort. Here are some of the highlights of their project.
The objectives.Wells Fargo (like all large banks) sends a wide variety of communications, both online and offline, to their customers. Wells Fargo wanted to make sure that the collection of these communications were “customer friendly.” In particular, the bank wanted to see how customers responded to its “Writing With C-A-R-E” (Consistent, Approachable, Resepectful, and Empathetic) guidelines.
The study.The bank recruited 20 customers who matched their three target personas to comment on all of the communications (e.g., account service notification, marketing solicitations) they received from Wells Fargo and other organizations over a 30-day period. These customers called a toll-free number to share their immediate reaction about the documents and they also kept a scrapbook in which they wrote comments about each communication. The bank brought the most engaged customers together to debrief them in-person about their scrapbooks.
Lessons learned. Here are some of the insights that Wells Fargo took away from the research:
- The bank’s communications were meeting the basic needs of customers, but were falling short on the humanistic dimensions of “approachable” and “empathetic.”
- Customers wanted the bank to communicate like it knew them, similar to other communications they received from organizations like AARP.
- Marketing messages, especially those with presumptive language like ”Congratulations!” or “Good News,” were viewed quite negatively; customers used words like “ploy” and “scheme” to describe them.
- The bank could mitigate negative reactions to bad news like a notice of insufficient funds if the communications provided relevant advice.
- Many consumers view the bank’s Website as the primary visual reference point; noticing differences with layout, color, and other design elements in the communications.
- To ensure that the results were actionable, key stakeholders were engaged throughout the process. The findings were “socialized” with 700+ content writers across Wells Fargo during 30+ workshops.
Thanks. Thank you Robin and Helene for sharing this information.
The bottom line: There’s no substitute for the customers’ point of view.
Mattel Showcases Online Listening Community November 1, 2008
Posted by Bruce Temkin in Customer experience, EBD #1: Obsess About Customer Needs, Voice of the customer.Tags: Communispace, Mattel, Think Passenger
2 comments
In a previous post I highlighted the 2008 Groundswell Award winners. Given my focus on voice of the customer programs, I wanted to take a closer look at the winner for Listening: Mattel’s “The Playground.”
Here’s an excerpt from Mattel’s submission for the award:
Mattel’s Worldwide Consumer Insights Department created The Playground, a private online community of 500 moms with kids aged 3—10, with Communispace in June 2007 to help them listen to and gain insight into the lives and needs of moms to help drive growth and innovation. During the fall of 2007, Mattel had a series of product recalls on popular toy brands that sent the organization reeling… Moms from the community provided Mattel with insights around how they felt about the recall, how they felt about Mattel, how they felt about China-produced toys, their perceptions of Mattel’s response plan, what their biggest fears and concerns were, and what Mattel could do to help them.
My take: I’ve been looking at social technologies a lot more lately (don’t worry, I haven’t turned into a Web 2.0 fanatic). It turns out that many companies like Mattel are successfully using online communities to get deep customer insight, especially in two of the five levels of voice of the customer program: Continuous Listening and Project Infusion. Here are some things to keep in mind if you’re thinking about creating a private online community for the purpose of customer listening:
- Make the case for an online community based on the speed of getting insight and the depth of the insight
- Use a vendor like Communispace or Think Passenger to provide online community expertise
- Dedicate internal resources to understand how to best use online communities
- Recruit community members that represent important customer segments
- Plan on an ongoing set of activities to keep the community engaged
- Look for feedback across a wide range of areas (e.g., idea generation, product development, marketing messages)
- As with any voice of the customer tool, don’t forget to focus on all aspects of LIRMing: Listen, Interpret, React, and Monitor. (Debi, thanks for reminding me about this one)
The bottom line: Online communities are a key tool for voice of the customer programs.
Congrats To Groundswell Award Winners October 29, 2008
Posted by Bruce Temkin in Customer experience, Voice of the customer.Tags: Accenture, Borderless Workplace, Brooklyn Museum, Common Wealth Credit Union, Communispace, Groundswell, Groundswell Awards, Hershey, Hershey's Bliss House Party, House Party, Intuit, Mattel, Mattel's "The Playground" Community, MyStarbucksIdea.com, National Instruments, Nerd Network, Starbucks, Young & Free Alberta
add a comment
For those of you who don’t know, Forrester analysts Josh Bernoff and Charlene Li (she’s no longer with Forrester) published a great book on social computing called Groundswell. In conjunction with that book, Forrester created the Groundswell Awards to recognize firms that accomplish business goals with social applications. Well, the 2008 award winners were just announced and here are this year’s winners across eight categories:
- Embracing: MyStarbucksIdea.com by Starbucks
- Energizing: Hershey’s Bliss House Party by House Party
- Listening: Mattel’s “The Playground” Community by Communispace
- Managing: Borderless Workplace by Accenture
- Social Impact: Artshare, Click Exposition, and Posse by Brooklyn Museum
- Supporting: Nerd Network by National Instruments
- Talking: Young & Free Alberta by Common Wealth Credit Union
- Company transformation: Intuit
My take: First of all, congratulations to all of the winners! My research into voice of the customer best practices has pushed me to increasingly look at social technologies. While many of these activities are currently isolated inside of companies and are considered standalone ”social computing” activities, I see them getting blended into more comprehensive voice of the customer (VoC) and voice of the employee (VoE) programs. This will become even more important as firms adopt the new management imperative to make listening an enterprisewide skill.
The bottom line: Companies should resist being anti-social.
Management Imperative #1: Invest In Culture As A Corporate Asset October 21, 2008
Posted by Bruce Temkin in 6 New Management Imperatives, Corporate culture, Customer experience, Customer-centric DNA, Executive leadership, Voice of the customer.Tags: Edgar Schein, Arthur Carmazzi, Thomas Cummings, Christopher Worley
9 comments

Why do companies create capital expenditure approval processes and develop strict cash management procedures? To manage their corporate assets. But executives often spend little time, if any, focusing on another critical asset, their corporate culture. Leadership guru Arthur F. Carmazzi does a great job of describing the value of corporate culture:
The ability to do more than expected does not come from influencing others to do something they are not committed to, but rather to nurture a culture that motivates and even excites individuals to do what is required for the benefit of all.
Think about it: Corporate culture can amplify the value provided by just about every employee. How much is it worth to make employees 1%, 5%, 10%, 25%, or 50% more effective? When you consider this type of impact, it’s clear that corporate culture is, in fact, a real corporate asset. While it doesn’t show up on the balance sheet like other assets, executives need to treat corporate culture like they do other long-term assets.
Here’s how execs can manage their corporate culture assets:
- Track employee goodwill. When companies buy other companies, they often account for part of the price as “goodwill;” acknowledging that items like brand name and competitive positioning can be long-term assets. Following this approach, companies should track ”employee goodwill.” How? By surveying employees and reporting the results like you report the balance sheet; analyzing quarterly snapshots and changes over time. Think about creating a metric from questions like “How committed are you to helping the company achieve it’s mission and objectives?” “How likely are you to recommend this company as a place to work to your family and friends?”
- Develop a Voice Of The Employee program. I often write about the importance of a strong Voice of the Customer (VoC) program. Firms need to infuse customer insight throughout all of their activities. Companies should follow the same approach in designing a Voice of the Employee (VoE) program. What are the key elements to a VoC, and therefore also a VoE, program? LIRMing, which means designing processes for Listening, Intepreting, Reacting, and Monitoring. Companies should listen to employees in many different ways; similar to the five levels of a VoC program.
- Establish a vocabulary around culture. Culture is often seen as a “squishy” topic. To make it more tangible, execs need to use a consistent set of terminology and concepts. Edgar Schein’s research can help, especially his work on the three cognitive levels for organizational culture: 1) attributes that can be seen, felt and heard; 2) items that can be depicted by company slogans, mission statements, and different operational creeds; and 3) tacit assumptions that are unseen and not cognitively identified. In my research on customer-centric culture, I identified the 6 C’s of customer-centric DNA: Clear beliefs, Compelling stories, Consistent trade-offs, Collective celebrations, Constant communications, and Commitment to employees.
- Actively manage it. Just like with any asset that can gain or lose significant value, companies need to actively manage their corporate culture. This requires execs to spend their time and make investments on it; trying to optimize the ROC (return on culture). In Organization Development and Change, Cummings and Worley provide the following steps for cultural change: Formulate a clear strategic vision, display top-management commitment, model culture change at the highest level, modify the organization to support organizational change, select and socialize newcomers and terminate deviants, and develop ethical and legal sensitivity.
The bottom line: Don’t squander your corporate culture asset.
P.S. Here’s a link to all 6 New Management Imperatives



