Apple’s Newest Strategy: Influential Bundling August 25, 2008
Posted by Bruce Temkin in Customer experience.Tags: Apple, iPod Touch, MacBook, The Gap, Zales
6 comments
Last week I went with my family to an Apple store, mostly because my daughter needed a new computer for school. There was no question that we were going to buy a Mac; she wouldn’t consider anything else! (Even though we’ve been buying Dells in our house for about 15 years, I’ve become an Apple convert).
The experience was great. We got assigned an Apple Genius as we walked into the store and he very effectively walked us through all of our options. We ended up with a MacBook, an iPod Touch, a printer, Microsoft Office, and an extended warranty. He brought all of the products to us and we handled the transaction on his portable device. The entire process took about 15 minutes, we only needed to speak with one person, and we spent a bundle of money. Win for Apple, and win for us.
As I mentioned, we left with an iPod Touch. It turns out that Apple is running a program where you get a free iPod Touch if you buy a Mac. That was great for me. I’ve wanted an iPod Touch for watching movies while sitting in airports and planes. This promotion (along with Massachusetts’ tax free day) sealed the deal. My daughter got what she needed, and I ended up with something that I’ve wanted. Win for my daughter, and win for me.
As I reflected back on this experience, I realized the brilliance of Apple’s strategy. By bundling an iPod Touch into the deal, there was something in it for the Mac user (my daughter) and the decision maker/buyer (me). We all win.
This strategy isn’t new. The same general concept exists in the travel industry. Companies pay for flights and lodging, but business travelers get the loyalty points. I’m an American Airlines/JetBlue, Starwood/Marriott guy. There’s something for everyone.
Although people use this strategy, I’ve never seen it given a formal name. But I think it’s important enough to have one. So I’m calling the strategy Influential Bundling, and defining it as:
Packaging products and services that deliver value for key influencers
How about Zales giving free football tickets with the purchase of a diamond ring? Think about how many new engagements that would generate. Or maybe The Gap could run a deal where you get $50 and free shipping from Piperlime on any purchase of $250 from The Gap or Old Navy. Parents can get some stylish shoes after helping their kids pick out their back to school wardrobes.
The bottom line: What decisions makers can you reach with Influential Bundling?
The Satisfaction Quarterly Report, Q2 2008 August 21, 2008
Posted by Bruce Temkin in Customer experience.Tags: ACSI, American Customer Satisfaction Index, AOL, Apple, Ask.com, BMW, Chrysler, customer satisfaction, Google, HP, Jeep, Toyota, Whirlpool
add a comment
The American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) just released its Q2 2008 report that covers the following sectors: Internet news & information, portals & search engines, automotive, electronics, major appliances, and personal computers. As I mentioned in a previous post about the ACSI, it’s a great research effort that doesn’t gets enough visibility.
Here are some highlights of the new data:
Ratings Of Firms
- Top rated: Toyota and BMW
- Top rated relative to industry average: Apple and Google
- Largest improvement (since last year): Google and Apple
- Lowest rated: AOL and HP
- Lowest rated relative to industry average: AOL, Chrysler Jeep, and Ask.com
- Largest decline (since last year): Whirlpool and HP
Ratings Of Industries
- Top rated: Electronics
- Largest improvement (since last year): Internet Portals & Search Engines
- Lowest rated: Personal Computers
- Largest decline (since last year): Major Appliances
While it’s interesting to look at the data, I also like to read the commentary by Professor Claes Fornell who puts the customer satisfaction results in context of the overall economy. Here’s an excerpt from his Q2 2008 comments:
Future consumption growth is impeded by many factors, chief among them house-price deflation (which has trimmed household wealth), tougher credit conditions, a worsening labor market, and continued high fuel and food prices… Under these circumstances, even if customer satisfaction were rising, it would be difficult to offset pocketbook limitations. But since ACSI shows no aggregate growth, the outlook for more aggregate spending growth continues to be bleak… The ACSI forecast suggests a third quarter spending growth of no more than 2.3% and the economy will continue to struggle… But all is not doom and gloom. E-business and technology lead the way. Customer satisfaction for e-business is up by almost 6%.
The bottom line: Satisfaction may be down, but Apple and Google are doing something right
Zara Bypasses The Gap; It’s All About Customers August 18, 2008
Posted by Bruce Temkin in Customer experience, Disruptive customer experience strategies, Innovation.Tags: Inditex, The Gap, Zara
3 comments
The Spanish retail chain Zara has overtaken The Gap as the world’s largest clothing retailer. That’s amazing since many people outside of Europe probably don’t know much, if anything, about Zara. So what can we learn from Zara’s ascension to the top spot?
First of all, Zara is a division of Inditex, which is a vertically integrated apparel juggernaut. Unlike other large apparel corporations, the company owns all of its retailing, designing and manufacturing operations. This structural difference allows Zara to break some norms in the apparel industry.
Zara offers “instant fashions:” cheap, trendy clothing. In Zara shops, there are two new collections every week, and the company manages to design, produce, distribute and sell each of its collections in just four weeks. Here’s what Professor Isabel Díez Vial from the Complutense University of Madrid, who has studied Inditex, has said about the company:
The customer doesn’t go to the store at the beginning of summer or winter, and see what they want, and think about it and decide later what to buy. Instead, the customer has to go to the shop every 15 days because the collection is refreshed so frequently… This approach leads to a complete change in the production process. Instead of offering products that take a year to plan and sell, you now have a product that the customer demands.
In addition, Zara relies heavily on its front-line employees. Rather than squeezing costs out of its personnel costs, it sees them as a key to its advantage. By analyzing sales data, the retailer increases staff during the periods when there is heavy traffic in the store. Employees are also expected to provide feedback on any fashion trends they see or hear about — including what’s hot, what’s cold, or what’s missing from the current collection.
My take: Zara represents a great case study in how to change the paradigm by focusing on customers. Here are few lessons that others can learn from Zara’s approach:
- Break supplier-driven paradigms. In many industries you’ll find approaches that are based on some limitation of the companies. These supplier-driven paradigms, like very discrete seasons in apparel, aren’t optimizing customer experience. So there are opportunities to expand your business by challenging the status-quo.
- Disrupt with service amplification. Many firms view front-line employees as costs; which they try to minimize. That’s why there’s an opportunity for companies to differentiate themselves by investing in their people, like Zara. This approach, called service amplification, is one of the five disruptive customer experience strategies that I’ve mentioned before.
- Shorten cycle times. If it takes six months to define, design, and manufacture something, then you need to make decisions six months too early. Zara’s ability to cut the cycle times for getting products to market provides it with the ability to respond more effectively to changes in the market. So firms should find ways to cut down the time it takes to make changes in their offerings.
- Look to customers for innovation. As I discussed in the post Customer Experience Innovation: As Simple As 1-2-3, companies need to focus their innovation efforts around the needs of customers. Zara’s growth shows that there’s a lot of opportunity to find new and better ways to meet their needs.
The bottom line: The path to the top is always fueled by customers.
Play.com Tops UK Customer Experience Index August 13, 2008
Posted by Bruce Temkin in Customer Experience Index, Customer experience.Tags: Amazon.com, AOL, ASDA, British Gas, BT Internet/Openworld, John Lewis, Lloyds TSB, Play.com, T-Mobile, Tesco, Virgin/NTL Telewest, Vodafone
add a comment
Last November we introduced Forrester’s Customer Experience Index in the US, with Costco and Borders taking the top 2 spots. Using the same methodology to examine three key elements of customer experience (usefulness, ease of use, and enjoyability), we recently published the The UK Customer Experience Index, 2008.
Based on a survey of nearly 1,200 UK consumers, we ranked 25 firms. Here are some of the details:
- Top five in the rankings:
- Play.com [#1]
- Amazon UK [#2]
- John Lewis [#3]
- ASDA [#4]
- Tesco [#5]
- Bottom five in the rankings:
- British Gas [#25]
- AOL [#24]
- Virgin/NTL Telewest [#23]
- BT Internet/Openworld [#22]
- Vodafone [#21]
- Retailers took the top 8 spots, but here are the leaders in other sectors:
- Banking: Lloyds TSB [#8]
- Mobile: T-Mobile [#17]
- ISP: BT Internet/Openworld [#22]
We’ll be fielding the survey again in the US in a few months, so keep your eyes out for Forrester’s second annual Customer Experience Index later this year.
The bottom line: There’s room for customer experience improvements everywhere.
What The Heck Is Customer Experience? August 6, 2008
Posted by Bruce Temkin in Customer experience, Experience-Based Differentiation, Voice of the customer.4 comments
One of the key problems with customer experience is that it’s not an “official” discipline like engineering and accounting. So it lacks a lot of rigor around processes and definitions. That’s why I still get a lot of people asking me questions like: “what exactly is customer experience?“
So, here’s my definition of customer experience:
The perception that customers have of their interactions with an organization
I’ve previously posted a definition for the perfect customer experience:
A set of interactions that consistently exceeds the needs and expectations of a customer
And I’d define customer experience management (CEM) as:
The discipline of increasing loyalty by exceeding customers’ needs and expectations
There are three key elements to the CEM definition:
- Discipline. CEM is not about creating slogans like “this is the year of the customer.” It needs to be a set of ongoing activities like a well-established voice of the customer program.
- Increasing loyalty. CEM is not about an altruistic belief that customers should be treated better. It needs to be linked to more profitable (or strategically improved) long-term behaviors of customers.
- Customers’ needs and expectations. CEM is not about technology deployments or internal milestones. It needs to be calibrated from the perspective of target customers.
Now that we have some common definitions, it’s time to concentrate on the hard stuff: improving customer experience. And if you’ve been reading my blog, then you know what my recommendation is for that: Chart a path towards Experience-Based Differentiation (the blueprint for customer experience excellence) that conforms with the six laws of customer experience.
The bottom line: CEM is easier to define than to do.
What Consumers Want From Insurers August 5, 2008
Posted by Bruce Temkin in Customer experience, customer service.add a comment
I recently published a research report called What Consumers Want From Insurers that examined what consumers cared about the most when it came to their insurance providers. In our analysis of survey responses from nearly 5,000 US consumers, we found that consumers most want:
- a good reputation from life insurers
- low prices from auto/home insurers
- high quality coverage from health insurers
We took the analysis one step further and looked at how responses differed across five generations of consumers: Gen Y (18 to 27), Gen X (28 to 41), Younger Boomers (42 to 51), Older Boomers (52 to 62), and Seniors (63 and older). It turns out that Younger Boomers care the most about the actual coverage. Here are some other interesting factoids that we found:
- Life insurers: Gen X wants low prices, Younger Boomers want good coverage, and older consumers want a good reputation.
- Auto/home insurers: Young consumers want low prices, Younger Boomers want good coverage, and older consumers want good service.
- Health insurers: Gen Y and Seniors wants good service, Gen X wants low prices, and Boomers want good coverage.
The bottom line: Insurers need generational-specific strategies.
Great Advice From IBM’s Former CEO August 4, 2008
Posted by Bruce Temkin in Customer experience, Executive leadership.Tags: IBM, Lou Gerstner
add a comment
I just ran across a post in Fortune’s Postcards blog about a speech that Lou Gerstner gave at the Yale CEO Summit in New York in last month. Here’s a summary of his advice for how to transform a Fortune 500 company:
- Distinguish between transformation and turnaround. A turnaround is about management execution, but a transformation is about a fundamental change to the business. Transformation is much harder.
- You can’t transform a dodo. Gerstner quoted Warren Buffet’s rule: “When a management with a reputation for brilliance tackles a business with a reputation for bad economics, it is usually the reputation of the business that remains intact.”
- It’s all about the culture. I love what he says on this topic: “You have to transform the culture, not just the strategy. Culture is what people do when no one is watching.”
- Integrate as a team. He notes a major inconsistency within IBM: there were “Team” signs all around, but people were paid based on individual performance.
- You have to understand what people do everyday – the processes, the values, the rewards. This requires a great deal of involvement by the CEO
My take: Gerstner is a great leader; his turnaround of IBM will be remembered as one of the greatest management accomplishments of our time. So I was thrilled to see that his advice matches a lot of the advice that I’ve written in my (mini) book ”The 6 Laws Of Customer Experience.”
The bottom line: Get the business model right and focus on the people.
The Kindle: A Great Example Of Online Infusion August 1, 2008
Posted by Bruce Temkin in Customer experience, Disruptive customer experience strategies.Tags: Amazon.com, Kindle
4 comments
Kudos to Amazon.com. My prediction: The Kindle will revolutionize how people read books, newspapers, and magazines. This new product represents a great example of online infusion (designing offerings that natively incorporate online capabilities as part of the core product definition) which is one of the five disruptive customer experience strategies that I’ve discussed in the past.
I recently had the opportunity to play around with a Kindle…

While it has a few usability miscues, the Kindle gets enough right to establish a new paradigm for reading. It’s a great combination of product design and online capabilities.
What makes the Kindle a great disruptive product?
- Appealing form factor (smaller than most books)
- Simple core interactive buttons
- Immediate access to media (books, magazines, etc.) through cellular network
- Good readability, including font enlargement
The bottom line: There are many opportunities for an online infusion strategy; what’s yours?
Bank Experiences Break Down Across Channels July 29, 2008
Posted by Bruce Temkin in Customer experience, Financial services.Tags: Bank Of America, JPMorgan Chase, Wachovia, Wells Fargo
1 comment so far
In a recent research report called Banks’ Cross-Channel Experience, 2008, we evaluated the cross-channel experiences of four large US banks: Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Wachovia, and Wells Fargo. This analysis looked at our evaluation of cross-channel experiences across four industries. The results are particularly important for banks, since we’ve found that customer experience is highly correlated to loyalty in banking.
To analyze those experiences, we used Forrester’s Cross Channel Review (CCR) that evaluates interactions in five areas: Web, email, phone self-service, agent interactions, and transitions across those channels. While a company that passed all of the criteria in the CCR would earn a score of 57, the banks ended up with an average score of only -11. Bank of America led the group with a score of -2 while JPMorgan Chase ended up at the bottom with -27.
Here are some additional findings from the research:
- Banks, as a group, scored better than department stores and MP3 manufacturers, but worse than airlines.
- The three lowest scoring categories of banking experiences were channel choice, IVR navigation, and continuity across channels.
- Here are the highest/lowest scores for the banks in each area:
- Web site: Bank of America [+7] / JPMorgan Chase [-8]
- IVR: Wachovia [+3] / JPMorgan Chase [-6]
- Email: JPMorgan Chase [+1] / Wachovia [-4]
- Agent interactions: Wells Fargo [+1] / JPMorgan Chase [-7]
- Channel transitions: Wells Fargo [-2] / JPMorgan Chase [-7]
- While CCR evaluates 57 criteria, it turns out that all four banks received the lowest possible score on the following 7 criteria: (more…)
Lessons From Dunkin’ Donuts Chief July 28, 2008
Posted by Bruce Temkin in Customer experience, Executive leadership.Tags: Dunkin' Donuts, Jon Luther
2 comments
I’ve been pretty impressed with the pace of innovation at Dunkin’ Donuts over the last few years. A few years ago the firm spotted demand for Starbucks’ new Frappuccinos and came out quickly with its own drink, Coolattas. Dunkin’ recently expanded its menu to include smoothies, flat bread sandwiches, and pizzas that draw in the post-breakfast crowd.
So I was interested in reading an article about what the Dunkin Brands CEO, Jon Luther, had to say to the Entrepreneur Organization in Boston.
Luther transformed Dunkin’s stagnant brand by focusing on the organization’s culture and a refined view of it’s target customers.
The CEO developed a company-wide value system based on honesty, integrity and humility. And he took a pretty aggressive stance in making sure that it was adopted. As he said:
Workers who couldn’t or wouldn’t ascribe to those values left the company. The ones who remained, shared a common value system.
The company then focused its efforts on its core customers that consumer research showed were a no-frills bunch that love routine, and are proud of their busy schedules.
The bottom line: Dunkin combined the ingredients for transformation: culture + customers + innovation.
Even Dressing Room Experiences Get Better July 27, 2008
Posted by Bruce Temkin in Customer experience, Innovation.Tags: Bloomingdales, Mitsukoshi, Prada
5 comments
I just read an article in Forbes about new experiences that stores are designing into their dressing rooms. Here are some of the items discussed in the article:
- Mitsukoshi, a Japanese department store chain, is experimenting with an “intelligent fitting room” that gives customers the opportunity to check available sizes and styles of the items they are trying from inside the fitting room.
- Bloomingdales’ New York flagship store’s dressing room registers the items shoppers take in to try on and produces video and images of the merchandise. A touch screen gives shoppers the option to invite friends. By clicking on a url and logging on to a Web site, the friends can see the items being tried on and make comments. The shopper can then click on one of the recommendations, and make it appear in the mirror superimposed over his image, as though he were trying on the garment
- Prada’s SoHo and Beverly Hills stores have tried responsive mirrors that allow shoppers to simultaneously see pictures of themselves in all the items they try on to help them decide which they want to purchase
My take: It’s nice to see really innovative approaches to an under-served experience like dressing rooms. There are a few key things that other firms can learn from these efforts:
- There are many underserved experiences. Every company can find a number of “key moments” for customers that currently don’t meet those customers’ needs.
- Technology can really help. Over the last decade, consumers have been trained to use digital technologies — from cell phones to Internet browsers. So there’s more of an opportunity than ever to enhance experiences with technology.
- Let customers drive your innovation. It is easy to throw technology at experiences and end up with nothing more than additional costs. That’s why companies need to focus innovations on the needs of customers.
The bottom line: Find places where technology can wow your customers.
Biggby Coffee Takes On Starbucks July 25, 2008
Posted by Bruce Temkin in Customer experience, Executive leadership.Tags: Biggby Coffee, Starbucks
add a comment
Biggby Coffee, a chain based in Michigan, just opened it’s 100th coffee shop. While this franchise-based company isn’t about to displace Starbucks’ 11,000 US locations, it has an attitude that should help it continue to grow; even while Starbucks closes down some of its newer locations.
I really like what the Biggby Coffee CEO had to say (from an article in the Lansing State Journal):
- “Customer engagement is exactly what the folks at Biggby strive for“
- “The culture is what makes us successful. The Biggby way is a way of looking at customers as people, and that kind of engagement we have at our stores makes it a personal experience. People love our coffee, but the reason they come to our stores is it makes them feel good.”
- “We are a franchise company and Starbucks is not. Most of our operators are people from the community. There’s a big difference between an owner running the store and any other restaurant chain with many, many units. They’re not just an employee; they own the business. It adds energy, excitement and enthusiasm.”
- “The most effective thing I can do is go out and spend time at the stores, just hang out and engage. What I’m trying to do is make sure people have that heart that it takes.”
One of the larger franchise owners added this: ”One of their philosophies is every customer must leave the store in a better mood than when they arrived.”
The bottom line: Seattle doesn’t have a monopoly on great coffee experiences; or good moods
Best Buy’s Growth Plans Neglect Customers July 24, 2008
Posted by Bruce Temkin in Customer experience, EBD #1: Obsess About Customer Needs, Experience-Based Differentiation.Tags: Best Buy
3 comments
Mike Vitelli, executive VP of the Best Buy’s customer operating group, outlined this five point plan for the retailer’s growth:
- Continue to benefit from the CE industry’s steady growth of 6 percent over time.
- Open new stores and develop categories where it presently has limited share. These include Apple computers, a relatively recent brand addition; major appliances, which are benefiting from a differentiated assortment and a dedicated sales force with increased training; and mobile phones, which have been reinvigorated by a new business model developed with Carphone Warehouse.
- Introduce new categories, such as musical instruments. While all Best Buy stores carry a smattering of keyboards and guitars, the company is experimenting with extensive, “top-shelf” collections in several locations around the country.
- Develop completely new business models, such as the planned national rollout of Pacific Sales, the company’s West Coast chain of premium appliance stores.
- International growth. Best Buy has already established itself in Canada, China and Europe, and soon plans to open its first stores in Mexico and Turkey.
My take: None of these 5 points focus on customer experience. So I am very concerned about a degradation of Best Buy’s customer experience.
Later in the article it says: “Separately, Vitelli said the company is working hard to engender more personalized service on the store level in order to combine the scale benefits of a national chain with the hands-on attention of an independent dealer.” But if Best Buy does not see customer experience as one of the core components of its growth, then it will under-invest in this critical area. As it says in the 6th law of customer experience: You Can’t Fake It.
In Forrester’s Customer Experience Index, 2007, Best Buy was ranked #34 out of 112 firms — and 23rd out of 27 retailers on the list. So the retailer needs to adopt the 1st principle of Experience-Based Differentiation: Obsess About Customer Needs, Not Product Features.
I’d like to see Best Buy invest in several areas as a core part of its growth strategy: (1) Product training for employees (similar to The Container Store’s commitment to training); (2) Voice Of Employee systems (to capture and attack problems and issues at the front line); (3) Product selection tools (to help customers make product decisions in major categories); and (4) Improved Web-Store cross channel experiences.
The bottom line: Customer experience needs to be a core objective.
Free Book: The 6 Laws Of Customer Experience July 22, 2008
Posted by Bruce Temkin in 6 laws of customer experience, Customer experience.Tags: Free book
14 comments
A few weeks ago I introduced the 6 laws of customer experience. Since then, I’ve written posts for each of the six laws. It turns out that these posts have had extremely high readership. So I decided to pull the content together in a mini book: “The 6 Laws Of Customer Experience: The Fundamental Truths That Define How Organizations Treat Customers.”
Since it’s not really a novel (only 11 pages), I’m giving it away for free. Just click on the picture of the cover below. You can then print it out or save it to your computer. Go ahead and share this book(let) with as many people as you’d like. Spread the word!
The bottom line: Hopefully this book is worth more than it’s price.
CxP Law #6: You Can’t Fake It July 20, 2008
Posted by Bruce Temkin in 6 laws of customer experience, Customer experience.1 comment so far
You can fool some people for some of the time, but most people can eventually tell what’s real and what’s not. This shows up in a couple of areas. First of all, employees can sense if customer experience is not really a top priority with the executive team. The second place this shows up is in marketing efforts. No matter how much money you spend on advertising, you can’t convince customers that you provide better experiences than you do.
Here are some implications of this law:
- Don’t hide behind a 4th priority. While it’s possible to come up with a long list of priorities, there’s no way that many will get a great deal of attention. A good rule of thumb: Anything below your 3rd priority is not a priority at all. So make customer experience one of your top 3 priorities.
- Sometimes it’s better not to start. If you’re not committed to customer experience, then don’t start a major initiative; it’s a lot of hard work. And if customer experience isn’t a top priority, then the effort will likely fail. The result: Frustrated employees who are increasingly reluctant to re-engage in these types of efforts in the future.
- Advertise to reinforce, not create positioning. Since customers ultimately know how you treat them, the best you can do with marketing is to reinforce the truth. If you want to change how you are perceived, then start by treating customers better; and then use advertising to reinforce the new way that they’re being treated.
The bottom line: If you’re not committed to customer experience, you can only fool yourself.
P.S. Here’s a link to all 6 laws of customer experience.
Insights From Starbucks’ Marketing Chief July 18, 2008
Posted by Bruce Temkin in Customer experience.Tags: Starbucks, Terry Davenport
add a comment
I just read an interesting Q&A with Terry Davenport, Senior VP-Marketing at Starbucks. Here are some of the lessons that many companies can learn from his comments:
- “The internet still skews pretty young, especially with MyStarbucksIdea.com.” The company’s online suggestion box gets input from mostly a younger audience, so they can’t assume that it’s fully representative of their audience. My take: Make sure that you understand this phenomena for any online feedback mechanism that you use.
- “There’s another new tool we put in place… the customer passion panel.“ Starbucks uses this demographically representative online panel to test ideas. My take: All firms should think of developing a standing panel like this to lower the hurdle for getting ongoing customer feedback on a wide range of product and marketing ideas.
- “It’s <the cup> one of the best marketing tools we have.” Starbucks switched the logo on its cup from green to brown and will be switching it back to green again. My take: Don’t underestimate the potential of branding on all of your packaging: product containers, shopping bags, and shipping boxes.
- “Vivanno has been in the innovation stream almost a year now…“ Davenport talked almost nonchalantly about the company’s stream of innovations. My take: Companies should have pipelines of innovations and a consider a reinvention goal like having 30% of revenues come from products that have been introduced in the previous 3 years.
- “Sorbetto we saw from a couple of different angles in Italy.“ Sorbetto is a new product that is currently being launched in Los Angeles; it was developed during a trend-spotting trip to Italy last year. My take: Make sure you develop some approaches for innovation that get people in your company to periodically think outside of the box.
The bottom line: Keep an eye on Starbucks’ reinvention efforts
Wireless Carriers Lack Gen Y Loyalty July 17, 2008
Posted by Bruce Temkin in Customer experience, Gen Y.Tags: Wireless carriers
1 comment so far
I recently published a report called Customer Relationship Snapshot: Wireless Carriers that examined how consumers feel about their current relationship with wireless carriers. We asked nearly 5,000 US consumers a series of questions and analyzed the data across 5 generations of consumers: Gen Y (18-27 years old), Gen X (28 to 41), Younger Boomers (42 to 51), Older Boomers (52 to 62), and Seniors (63+). Here are some of the major findings:
- Interactions with wireless carriers meet their needs
- Highest rating: Gen Y (84%)
- Lowest rating: Seniors (75%)
- Likely to purchase another product from current provider
- Highest rating: Seniors (83%)
- Lowest rating: Gen Y (70%)
- Likely to remain with current provider
- Highest rating: Seniors (79%)
- Lowest rating: Gen Y (57%)
The bottom line: Wireless carriers have a Gen Y loyalty problem
CxP Law #5: Employees do what is measured, incented, and celebrated July 16, 2008
Posted by Bruce Temkin in 6 laws of customer experience, Customer experience.1 comment so far
Some executives struggle to understand why their company doesn’t deliver better experiences to customers. But it shouldn’t be such a big mystery. It’s all about how you deal with employees, who tend to conform to the environment that they’re in. What are the key elements to the corporate environs? The metrics that are tracked, the activities that are rewarded, and the actions that are celebrated. These three items collectively drive how employees behave and how they ultimately treat customers.
Here are some implications of this law:
- Don’t “expect” people to do the right thing. While employees may want to treat customers well, you can’t just expect them to do it. Why not? Because companies want their employees to do a lot of things. But organizations often hone their measurements, incentives, and celebrations to achieve short-term growth and profitability targets. So without any explicit intervention on behalf of customer experience, the environment will push employees to focus on just about anything except customer experience.
- Clearly define good behavior. Before you just adjust the environment, it’s important that you define/describe the type of behavior that you want from people in every role. Do you want customer service reps to spend whatever time they need to on the phone to solve a problem or do you want them to cut down the average handle time on each call? The measurements, incentives, and celebrations should be adjusted to reinforce those behaviors.
- Watch out for mixed messages. You can only get consistent behaviors from employees when all three levers (measurements, incentives, and celebrations) are working together. If you celebrate things that are different than what you measure, for instance, then employees aren’t sure which signals to follow.
The bottom line: Don’t blame employees, fix the environment.
P.S. Here’s a link to all 6 laws of customer experience.
Learning From The Dabbawala July 15, 2008
Posted by Bruce Temkin in Customer experience.add a comment
Have you heard of the dabbawala? Well, I hadn’t until I ran across an article in The Economist called The cult of the dabbawala. It turns out that this group in Mumbai that delivers daily lunches has attained incredible levels of operational efficiency without the use of any technology. Here’s an excerpt from the article:
Using an elaborate system of colour-coded boxes to convey over 170,000 meals to their destinations each day, the 5,000-strong dabbawala collective has built up an extraordinary reputation for the speed and accuracy of its deliveries… The system the dabbawalas have developed over the years revolves around strong teamwork and strict time-management… The meals are then delivered-99.9999% of the time, to the right address.
My take: It’s good to see very clearly that technology is not the solution to all problems. By developing and maintaining a very simple system with clear rules, people can understand and deliver on the objectives of that system and consistently meet customer expectations; just like the dabbawala.
The bottom line: Many processes can use a simplicity makeover.
Is Loyalty More Important Now? No! July 13, 2008
Posted by Bruce Temkin in Customer experience.Tags: Hilton Hotels
add a comment
I just read an article in Advertising Age called Marketers Put Emphasis on Loyalty which talks about how companies are focusing on loyalty programs during the economic downturn. According to Adam Burke, Hilton Hotel’s senior VP-customer loyalty:
Like a lot of people in the [hospitality] industry, we’re starting to see some slowing. Our Honors members tend to be the group that buoys us through a downturn. They are the core audience and tend to stay loyal and sustain the business especially through those downturns.
That dynamic is true in other industries; loyal customers really help in a downturn. So is loyalty more important in a downturn? Absolutely not! Loyalty is ALWAYS important.
Let’s consider a simple loyalty lifecycle: (1) Engage customers, (2) build loyalty, (3) reinforce loyal activities. Downturns are the worst time for (1) and (2) because there are fewer customers. It’s the time to really hone in on (3). So if you just start thinking about loyalty during a downturn, it’s too late.
The bottom line: Loyalty is an asset that you build up when you need it the least.
CxP Law #4: Unengaged Employees Don’t Create Engaged Customers July 11, 2008
Posted by Bruce Temkin in 6 laws of customer experience, Customer experience.4 comments
If you want to improve customer experience, then it might seem obvious that you should focus completely on customers. For most firms, though, that’s not the correct approach. Where should you focus? On employees. While you can make some customers happy through brute force, you can not sustain great customer experience unless your employees are bought-in to what you’re doing and are aligned with the effort. If employees have low morale, then getting them to “wow” customers will be nearly impossible.
This relationship between employee engagement and customer experience was described very clearly in The Service-Profit Chain, which was was published in the Harvard Business Review in 1994:
Profit and growth are stimulated primarily by customer loyalty. Loyalty is a direct result of customer satisfaction. Satisfaction is largely influenced by the value of services provided to customers. Value is created by satisfied, loyal, and productive employees.
Walt Disney also captured this concept very simply:
You can design and create, and build the most wonderful place in the world. But it takes people to make the dream a reality.
Here are some implications of this law:
- Don’t under-spend on training. You can’t just change some business rules and processes and hope that customers will be treated better. Just about any change to customer experience requires some employees to change what they do and how they do it. So don’t skimp on the training effort.
- Make it easy to do the right thing. If it’s hard for employees to do something, then they are less likely to do it — and more likely to get frustrated. That’s why enabling technologies need to be designed for employees to easily accomplish tasks that help customers.
- Communicate, communicate, communicate. If you want to have employees feel like they’re a part of something, then you need to tell them what’s going on. So develop a robust communications plan that not only tells employees what the company is doing, but also explains why you’re doing it. And it helps if you sincerely solicit feedback!
- Find ways to celebrate. If employees do things that help customers, then find a way to celebrate those actions. These celebrations can take many different forms: a handwritten note from the president, acknowledgement in a company newsletter, or an on-the-spot bonus. Look for opportunities to catch people doing the right thing.
- Measure employee engagement. Firms need to put the same rigor in monitoring employee relationships that they do in monitoring customer relationships. So they need to develop a relationship tracking measure like “likelihood to recommend <firm> as a place to work” that is used to gauge progress and to identify corrective measures.
The bottom line: Customer experience depends on employee experience.
P.S. Here’s a link to all 6 laws of customer experience.
CxP Law #3: Customer Familiarity Breeds Alignment July 9, 2008
Posted by Bruce Temkin in 6 laws of customer experience, Customer experience.2 comments
Not many people wake up in the morning and say “today, I want to make life miserable for our customers.” Yet every day, lots of employees (from front-liners to senior execs) make decisions that end up frustrating, annoying, or downright upsetting their customers. But it’s often not individual actions that cause the problems. Often times, the issues come down to a lack of cooperation or coordination across people and organizations.
Given that most people want their company to better serve customers, a clear view of what customers need, want, and dislike can align decisions and actions. If everyone shared a vivid view of the target customers and had visibility into customer feedback, then there would be less disagreement about what to do for them. While it may be difficult to agree on overall priorities and strategies, it’s much easier to agree on the best way to treat customers.
Here are some implications of this law:
- Don’t wait for organizational alignment. No organizational structure is perfect; they all have some flaws. And it takes a long time to make major organizational changes. So rather than waiting for a structural change to create alignment, use a clear focus on customer needs as a way to align the decisions and actions of individuals — even if the organizations remain out of alignment.
- Broadly share customer insight. While we all know that front-line employees affect customer experience, almost everyone in the company also has some impact on how customers are treated. Think of your company as a large production crew making the stars (front-line employees) shine on stage (during customer interactions). Since many of the decisions that impact customers aren’t debated or discussed, they just happen, it helps for as many people as possible to understand customers. Think of this as a silent alignment process.
- Talk about customer needs, not personal preferences. Disagreements are somewhat natural when people debate things from their own points of view. Instead of discussing what you like or think, re-frame discussions to be about customers. If you find that you don’t really know enough about customers to solve the disagreement, then stop arguing and go get more information about your customers.
The bottom line: An external focus is an antidote to internal politics.
P.S. Here’s a link to all 6 laws of customer experience.
The Best And Worst Of Website Design July 7, 2008
Posted by Bruce Temkin in Customer experience.add a comment
We just published Best And Worst Of B2C Site Design, 2008 which evaluated the consumer-facing Websites of the following 16 large companies (this was part of our cross-channel evaluations):
- Airlines: American Airlines, Delta Air Lines, Southwest Airlines, United Air Lines
- Banks: Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, Wachovia, Wells Fargo
- Department stores: JC Penney, Kohl’s, Macy’s, Sears
- Mp3 manufacturers: Apple, Creative, iRiver, Sony
The research used Forrester’s Web Site Review methodology (which is a form of an expert review) to grade the experiences across 25 criteria. Here are some of the findings from the research:
- None of the sites received a passing score [25 or higher]; the overall average was -5.2
- Airlines [0.8] got the highest average score; MP3 manufacturers [-17] got the lowest
- Delta Airlines [14] got the highest score; Sony [-21] got the lowest
- The criteria break down into four categories: Value, Navigation, Presentation, and Trust. Banks struggled the most with the Value criteria, while the other industries struggled most with Navigation criteria.
- For each of the 25 criteria, sites received a grade between -2 (severe failure) to +2 (best practice); a pass is +1 or more. Here are the criteria with the lowest average scores across the sites:
- Is text legible? [-2.0]
- Is the task flow efficient? [-1.5]
- Does the site help users avoid and recover from errors? [-1.2]
- Does the site present privacy and security policies in context? [-1.0]
- Does the landing page(s) provide evidence that the user goals can be completed? [-0.9]
- Are keyword-based searches comprehensive and precise? [-0.9]
- Do menu categories immediately expose or describe their subcategories? [-0.5]
- Do interactive elements behave as expected? [-0.4]
Interestingly, these results are consistent with the findings that I discussed in my first post Lessons Learned From 1,001 Web Site Reviews.
I need to give a shout out to the Vidya Drego, Adele Sage, and Andrew McInnes who did most of the hard work on the research.
The bottom line: There’s no good reason for a bad Web experience.
What Research Was Hot In Q2 2008? July 3, 2008
Posted by Bruce Temkin in Customer experience.1 comment so far
The beginning of July marks the end of Q2 2008. Before I fully look ahead to Q3, I want to take some time and look back at the last 3 months. As I mentioned in the post about my 2008 research agenda, it’s helpful to see what people are reading because as P. L. Travers said:
A writer is, after all, only half his book. The other half is the reader and from the reader the writer learns.
It appears that my research remains on the right track (see my analysis from last quarter: Which Customer Experience Topics Are Hot?). Once again, my reports had the highest level of readership across all Forrester analysts; 32% higher than the second analyst on the list.
To get a better sense of what’s hot, I compiled the following list of my 15 most-read research reports in Q2 (along with their publication dates):
- The Business Impact Of Customer Experience
(March 24, 2008). See post: The Holy Grail: A Link Between Customer Experience And Loyalty - How Consumers Research, Buy, And Get Service
(March 31, 2008). See post: Dial 1-800 For Customer Service - Customer Relationship Snapshot: Insurers
(April 29, 2008). - Three Different Gaming Approaches That Can Enhance Online Experiences
(April 30, 2008). - Eight Steps For Keeping Customer Experience Momentum During An Economic Downturn
(April 25, 2008). See posts: Keep Customer Experience Momentum In A Recession and Keep Your Good People, Even In A Recession - Obstacles To Customer Experience Success, 2008
(February 7, 2008). See post: Obstacles To Customer Experience Success - Experience-Based Differentiation
(January 2, 2007). See post: Experience-Based Differentiation and the category of posts about Experience-Based Differentiation - Young Gen Yers: Fun-Loving, Social, And Wired
(January 3, 2008). - What Consumers Want From Financial Institutions
(June 10, 2008). See post: What Do Consumers Want From Financial Institutions? - The Gen Y Design Guide
(December 3, 2007). See post: Designing Experiences For Gen Y - RockYou Showcases Gen Y Design Practices
(April 17, 2008). - The Strength Of Customer Relationships
(February 21, 2008). - The Customer Experience Index, 2007
(November 21, 2007). See post: Forrester’s 2007 Customer Experience Rankings - Customer Experience Thrives With Executive Leadership
(April 24, 2008). See posts: Customer Experience Thrives With Executive Leadership and Senior Execs Are Not Fully Customer-Centric - The Experiences That Satisfy Consumers
(February 11, 2008). See posts about channels: Phone satisfaction, Web satisfaction, and store/branch satisfaction
In case you want to know a bit more about these reports, I’ve also included the Executive Summaries from all of those report:




